-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Capitol Hill
14 November 2007
On Capitol Hill, another fierce debate is underway about the war in Iraq, as the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives considers a measure to provide $50 billion in short-term funding for U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. VOA's Dan Robinson reports the legislation, which also awaits a vote in the Senate, faces a veto threat from President Bush.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders wanted to bring up the legislation as early as last week, but were forced to delay until late Wednesday to round up sufficient votes. They eventually persuaded the most vocal2 anti-war Democrats3, who favor specific mandatory4 troop withdrawal5 timelines, to support the measure, which calls for transitioning U.S. forces away from combat, and opposes extending or prolonging the war. In exchange for short-term funding, Democrats would require the president to begin withdrawing U.S. troops within 30 days of enactment6. They set only a goal of pulling most combat forces out by December 15th, 2008.
But this brought a renewed veto threat from the White House, where press secretary Dana Perino briefed reporters. "Once again they plan to send the president a bill that they know he will veto. This is for political posturing7 and to appease8 radical9 groups," she said.
Fifty billion dollars would pay for about four months of military operations and without the money, the Pentagon would have to begin dipping into its regular budget to pay for military operations. The Democrat1's measure also directs that funds be used only to protect U.S. forces and American diplomats10 on the ground, for counter-terrorism, and what is called limited training, equipment and logistical support for Iraqi security forces, and attempts to set strict rules against the use of torture of terrorist suspects. Republicans assailed11 it, asserting Democrats want to tie the hands of military commanders at a time when President Bush's military surge strategy seems to be bringing a downturn in violence in Baghdad.
"The tide is turning in Iraq. We are seeing far more than pockets of success. We are seeing a dramatic shift in the landscape," said California Republican David Dreier, who spoke12 on the House floor.
Massachusetts Democrat Jim McGovern cautioned against putting too much faith in recent statistics. "They [Republicans] want no strings13, no conditions, no benchmarks, no end dates, no accountability, no nothing. Today they will tell us that the president's strategy is working, that the recent decrease in deaths and casualties in certain areas of Iraq prove it, and that therefore we should provide another blank check."
Secretary of States Condoleeza Rice and Defense14 Secretary Robert Gates were on Capitol Hill Wednesday to brief lawmakers on Iraq, and pressing hard against the Democratic measure. Illinois Democrat Richard Durbin provided this assessment15 of what he learned in that meeting. "It is very clear that there are no plans to bring any substantial number of American troops home soon. In fact, the only projection16 to reach pre-surge levels is well into next year," he said.
In the Senate, the Democratic measure faced an uphill battle because a 60-vote majority is required in the 100 member chamber17 to overcome procedural hurdles18 that block approval. Senate Republicans Wednesday introduced their own alternative legislation to provide $70 billion, but without any policy restrictions19.
Senate majority leader Harry20 Reid made clear this week while they have been unable to attract Republican support for strong withdrawal provisions through numerous votes this year, Democrats have no intention of giving up. "We are going to continue until the course if changed, to change course in Iraq, for the military and for the American taxpayer," he said.
Democrats deliberately21 put off action on President Bush's larger $196 billion request, saying that if the president rejected their short-term measure, there would likely be no further action on war funding in this congressional session. In the unlikely event President Bush signed an interim22 funding bill emerging from Congress, Democratic leaders would bring up additional funding increments23 next year, but stress they do not intend to give the president a blank check for military operations for the remainder of his time in office.
收听单词发音 |
1
democrat
|
|
| n.民主主义者，民主人士；民主党党员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
vocal
|
|
| adj.直言不讳的；嗓音的；n.[pl.]声乐节目 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
democrats
|
|
| n.民主主义者，民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
mandatory
|
|
| adj.命令的；强制的；义务的；n.受托者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
withdrawal
|
|
| n.取回，提款；撤退，撤军；收回，撤销 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
enactment
|
|
| n.演出，担任…角色；制订，通过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
posturing
|
|
| 做出某种姿势( posture的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
appease
|
|
| v.安抚，缓和，平息，满足 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
radical
|
|
| n.激进份子，原子团，根号；adj.根本的，激进的，彻底的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
diplomats
|
|
| n.外交官( diplomat的名词复数 )；有手腕的人，善于交际的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
assailed
|
|
| v.攻击( assail的过去式和过去分词 )；困扰；质问；毅然应对 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
strings
|
|
| n.弦 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
defense
|
|
| n.防御，保卫；[pl.]防务工事；辩护，答辩 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
assessment
|
|
| n.评价；评估；对财产的估价，被估定的金额 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
projection
|
|
| n.发射，计划，突出部分 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
chamber
|
|
| n.房间，寝室；会议厅；议院；会所 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
hurdles
|
|
| n.障碍( hurdle的名词复数 )；跳栏；（供人或马跳跃的）栏架；跨栏赛 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
restrictions
|
|
| 约束( restriction的名词复数 )； 管制； 制约因素； 带限制性的条件（或规则） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
harry
|
|
| vt.掠夺，蹂躏，使苦恼 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
deliberately
|
|
| adv.审慎地；蓄意地；故意地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
interim
|
|
| adj.暂时的，临时的；n.间歇，过渡期间 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
increments
|
|
| n.增长( increment的名词复数 )；增量；增额；定期的加薪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索