听力内容有不详尽之处啊，欢迎大家留言讨论，纠正。谢谢

 

We are Join with by  our legal analyst Dan Abrams, and Dan, I tell you I’ve not seeing you actually this outrage sometimes.

It’s hard to believe this right, what you are talking about, 2 American kids, age 5 and 3, affective been shipped-France just for this summer, but affectively been shipped-France be with their father, why? Because he got kids in that country, so, now, the mother, Kelly Rutherford has to fly to France to see her kids because he got kids got this country, no allegation of wrong doing on her part or his part of parents, simply I think this judge affectively look this kids like travelling age, basically see why you know it will be easier for her to travel here rather than for him, he can’t come to United States, no

We heard the name, we heard that point made of piece,  do you really think the judge just think, hey, she can jump the private plane be there Monaca 

It’s not quite what the judge said, but is there is the things, that, yes, show be able to make there, show be able to work it out , and I don’t think this is a fair way to look this kids, I mean, one of things we are talking about with this case was how hard his job out changing, that’s a growing ending, she may have certainty in her life with regard to travel , judge disregard it, I think a bit been a man ,mother did a different story, 

Quickly, this Kelly Rutherford would appeal 

Yes, absolutely she should appeal, we will see how it goes but I can’t understand how this judge came to this ruling in this case with American citizen turn now being shipped France 

You got lots of understanding look for that